Given the buzz around the prospect of your beloved Wolverines opening the season in a maize alternate uniform, you should know it’s not the first time.  Readers of this site are aware of the canary disaster of 1928, but here’s a refresher:

I first read about all this thanks a tip from Bruce Madej, the legendary U-M SID, who reviewed the Uniform Timeline sent over a ditty from his book, Champions of the West.  Within a section of the book talking about Fritz Crisler and the launch of the winged helmet at Michigan in 1938, it gets into a little uniform history— including this spicy meatball:

The only change in the typical blue uniforms before 1949 came in 1928.  As Michigan planned to play Navy in Baltimore, the Midshipmen refused to wear any other color than their traditional blue.  Therefore, Michigan came out in bright yellow jerseys with blue numerals.  The team was said to look like canaries, and the uniforms were put away after the 6-6 tie.

Fast forward to today, and we can see that Navy did indeed have a uniform that resembled the gear the Wolverines wore back in the 1920s.  (But note, FWIW, I think that happened a lot back then).   Anyway – Via eBay, here’s a look at an advertisement that was created for that very November 10, 1928 game, in the form of a pop-up Navy footballer.

Navy vs. Michigan ad 1928 - Baltimore, MD

The only major difference was the Midshipmen’s striped socks so they wanted to do something.  Here’s a game photo from the ’29 Michiganensian, and while it’s gray and grainy, you can see that one squad is wearing the lighter color:

[Update via Reader Jumpman – a colorized version of the canaries:

Now, for the serious historians, you should know that Michigan was trying to figure out how to deal with this conflict of color vs. Navy before 1928.  In fact in 1927, the year the freshly minted Michigan Stadium opened for business, your Wolverines wore maize helmets (or headgears as it were) at the game in Ann Arbor [via the Michigan Daily archives]:

Of course this is still more than a decade before the winged helmets appeared, but it is significant nonetheless.

1928 wasn’t the only time Michigan had a challenge with the fairer of our two school colors.  Just a few years ago those high and bright maize numerals on Outback Bowl jerseys became invisible, like Wonder Woman’s jet, when viewed in the Florida sun from beyond 55 yards:

Can not see michigan uniforms

Related: Uniform timeline (updated)
Follow MVictors on Twitter

04. April 2017 · 1 comment · Categories: 2017

With the first two rounds in the books, it’s time to turn our attention to Round 3.

This time, the criteria used for each pairing will be the best, or signature, run from each running back.  When you think of these running backs, what play do you think of? Whose one play is better than the other’s?

To make it easier for you and your memory banks, I went deep into the Dr. Sap Archives and captured what I feel is the best play/run for each of our remaining running backs. The links provided will give you a trip down memory lane for sure and bring us one step closer to determining Bo’s Best Back.
Here are the brackets:



(#1) Rob Lytle vs. (#4) Russell Davis

1976 Rob Lytle 75-yard TD run vs. Michigan State

1976 Russell Davis 85-yard TD run vs. Stanford

While Davis’s run was right up there with Tom Harmon’s record-setting jaunt against California in 1940, it did come against the Stanford backups. But should that matter? The run by Lytle is why he was dubbed the “Fremont Flash” by Bob Ufer. Another close one to call, but I gotta go with Lytle. That run against MSU served notice to everyone that Michigan and #41 were a force to be reckoned with in 1976.



(#2) Billy Taylor vs. (#3) Gordon Bell

1971 Billy Taylor 21-yard TD run vs. Ohio State

1975 Gordon Bell 25-yard TD run vs. Purdue

Make no mistake about it, Gordon Bell’s run was an amazing individual effort, but is it enough to overcome Billy Taylor’s game-winning run against Ohio State that preserved an undefeated season? Both are great, iconic and signature runs for each player. It’s why #5 is remembered as “The Whirling Dervish” and why #42 is remembered as “Touchdown Billy Taylor!” A tough one to call for sure, but I gotta go with BT on this one!




(#1) Jamie Morris vs. (#4) Leroy Hoard

1986 Jamie Morris 52-yard Run vs. OSU  /  1988 Jamie Morris 77-yard TD run vs. Alabama  /

1988 Leroy Hoard 54-yard TD runs vs. Indiana  /  1989 Rose Bowl 61-yard run vs. USC  /

When you think of these two backs, these plays come to mind. Both were tough to bring down and both could go the distance. Either play is the essence of who these backs were – strong, fast and determined to get into the endzone. In the final analysis, I’m gonna go with Jamie Morris & his Alabama run. That was, and still is, an incredible run!



(#2) Butch Woolfolk vs. (#3) Tony Boles

1979 Butch Woolfolk 92-yard TD run vs. Wisconsin  /  1980 Butch Woolfolk 36-yard run vs. Notre Dame  /

1989 Tony Boles 91-yard TD run vs. Indiana  /  1989 Tony Boles 73-yard run vs. Illinois  /

An incredible matchup here as we have the longest run in Michigan Football history and the second longest run in the annals of Wolverine pigskin lore. Too tough to call as both backs went the distance, but both also made defenders miss. Both made it look easy, but didn’t make my decision any easier. In a tossup, I’m gonna go with Butch – by a yard!


Next up:  A quick post on the final 4 and voting

28. March 2017 · Comments Off on Bo’s Best Back: Round 2 · Categories: 2017

By Steve “Dr. Sap” Sapardanis

Read the breakdown from Round 1 and here’s the updated bracket:


Here are the round 2 match-ups and winners, again, based on each running back’s signature game – all as selected by Dr. Sap:

1970’s Burton Region

(#1) Rob Lytle 

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1976 Michigan St 10 180 18.0 1 75

(#9) Chuck Heater

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1972 at Illinois 29 155 5.3 2 15

This numbers in this pairing are surprising both players. Heater lugged the pigskin 29 times, gained over 150 yards and scored 2 TD’s in Champaign-Urbana. That’s solid! That being said, The Fremont Flash, as Bob Ufer used to call Rob Lytle, carried only 10 times against MSU in 1976, but #41 torched the Sparty D for 180 yards – an 18.0 yard per carry average (still a Michigan record to this day) – UNREAL!! Gawdy numbers all over the place, but Lytle gets the nod to move to Round 3.


(#4) Russell Davis 

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1976 Stanford 7 116 16.6 2 85

(#5) Ed Shuttlesworth

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1972 Tulane 20 151 7.5 3 18

Another fullback matchup and this one is a doozie! Easy Ed romps for over 150 yards on 20 carries with 3 three TD’s as a fullback. Very impressive. Russell Davis, from the fullback spot, torched the Stanford Cardinal for 2 TD’s, 116 yards, a 16.6 yards per carry average and punctuated his effort with an 85-yard lightning bolt – then the longest run in Michigan Football History – WoW! In what may be the toughest decision so far in the tournament, I gotta go with #33 on this one. That’s just an impressive effort any way you slice it. Davis moves on to Round 3.


1970’s Chuck Stobart REGION

(#2) Billy Taylor 

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1969 at Iowa 21 225 10.7 2

(#7) Glenn Doughty

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1970 Michigan State 8 85 10.6 1

These teammates and roommates get to settle it once and for all – who had the best game between the two of them? Their average yards per carry was almost identical, but Taylor’s performance against the Hawkeyes in 1969 is head and shoulders better than Doughty’s 85 yards and 1 TD against MSU in 1970. Bo talked about how Michigan “dismembered” Iowa in 1969, and much of that had to do with Taylor’s 225 yards on 21 carries and 2 TD’s – Dang, THAT’S impressive! Billy Taylor moves on to Round 3.


(#3) Gordon Bell 

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1975 at Wisconsin 28 210 7.5 0 29

(#6) Harlan Huckleby

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1976 Stanford 16 157 9.8 1 54

This is another tough decision. In 1976 against Stanford, Huckleby scampered for 157 yards with a 9.8 yard average, and one 54-yard eye-opening TD run to start the game. That’s just an impressive effort any way you slice it. Bell carried 28 times, ran for over 200 yards and averaged over 7 yards a carry on the road, in Camp Randall no less – that’s yeomen-like, as well! Like I said, this is a tough one, but I gotta put Gordy Bell and all his juke moves into Round 3.


1980’s Gary Moeller REGION

(#1) Jamie Morris 

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1987 vs Alabama 23 234 10.2 3 77

(#8) Gerald White

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1985 Ohio State 29 110 3.8 0 13

Another matchup involving teammates, and it’s a good one! Gerald White’s best game as a Michigan running back came against Ohio State in 1985. He carried 29 times and gained 110 yards in that victory against the Buckeyes. Jamie Morris, however, took it to another level in his last game as a Wolverine. J-Mo went for 234 yards, 3 TD’s and a 10.2 yards per carry average against Alabama! Are you kidding me? It ranks as one of, if not, THE most impressive game by a running back in Michigan Football Bowl history, according to Dr. Sap. Morris with his historic and herculean effort move on to Round 3.


(#4) Leroy Hoard 

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1988 Indiana 7 128 18.3 3 54

(#5) Stanley Edwards

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1980 Illinois 18 152 8.4 1 42

Another good matchup with some big time numbers put up by both backs. Anytime you rush for over 150 yards, average over 8 yards per carry and score a TD, that’s a heckuva day! I was there when Stanley Edwards did this against Illinois and Purdue in 1980. He was running downhill and at his best in those games, in my opinion. While Leroy Hoard gained more yards in other games, his performance against Indiana in 1988 was quite the memorable one. He carried the ball only 7 times, but scored 3 TD’s and gained 128 yards including a 54 yard TD against the Hoosiers. I gotta go with #33 here! Hoard roars on to Round 3!


1980’s Don Nehlen REGION

(#2) Butch Woolfolk 

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1981 at MSU 39 253 6.5 0 27

(#7) Jarrod Bunch

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1990 at Indiana 9 78 8.7 1 32

Jarrod Bunch had his best game as a Wolverine against Indiana in 1990. He rumbled for 78 yards, 1 TD and averaged almost 9 yards per carry. I’m sure the IU defenders left with multiple headaches that afternoon thanks to #32. Butch Woolfolk showed MSU and the Michigan faithful that he was not just a track guy who played football. Any questions about Butch’s strength and ability to carry the load for an entire game was put to rest that day in 1981. The guy who’s real name is Harold, lugged the rock 39 times and gained 253 yards against the Spartans his senior season. That’s good enough to get #24 on to Round 3.


(#3) Tony Boles 

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1988 at Wisconsin 10 179 17.9 3 81

(#6) Lawrence Ricks

Season Opponent Att Net Yd Yd/Att TD Long
1982 Purdue 31 196 6.3 2 52

To quote Hall of Fame Broadcaster, Dick Enberg, “Oh my!” What a matchup we have here! Lawrence Ricks bludgeoned Purdue for 196 yards on 31 carries and 2 TD’s (including a 52-yarder) against the Boilermakers in 1982. Tony Boles had his best game against Wisconsin in 1988. He only carried 10 times, but torched the Badgers for 179 yards and 3 TD’s – very similar to Rob Lytle’s record-setting effort against MSU in 1976. That’s good enough to move Boles on to Round 3.

 Next up: the Elite 8 evaluated on the hypothetical handoff – 1 play for all the marbles, who gets the ball?



Follow MVictors on Twitter 

26. March 2017 · Comments Off on Bo’s Best Back: Round 1 · Categories: 2017

Guest post by Steve “Dr. Sap” Sapardanis

Much like I did a few years ago with the Bo Brackets in trying to determine Bo’s best team, this time I decided to answer the age old question: Who was Bo’s best running back?

There have been some great ones over the years and I thought it would be a fun look back on what these former Wolverines did on the gridiron.  Again, when looking back, I kept the backs in their own era or decade – this makes it easier when comparing stats and accomplishments. As a result, I put the best 16 backs of the 70’s on one side and the top 16 backs of the 80’s on the other side of the brackets.  I used the following criteria to help determine who would advance each round to become Bo’s Best Back:

  • Round 1 – Best Stats (Yards Gained, TD’s, etc.)
  • Round 2 – Best/Signature Game
  • Round 3 – Best/Signature Run
  • Round 4 – The Hypothetical Handoff. If you needed someone to carry the rock on 4th and goal on the last play to win the game, who would it be?
  • Round 5 – Reader/Viewer Vote

Alright, enough of the preamble. Below are the brackets:

On to the match-ups!




(#1) Rob Lytle vs. (#16) Kevin King


While these two backs were teammates, this matchup is a no-brainer. You have a guy who most M fans don’t even remember pitted up against an All-American, who placed 3rd in the Heisman Trophy his senior year. Kevin King played four years in a crowded and talented Wolverine backfield. His lone TD came in the closing moments of the 69-0 rout of Navy in 1976. King netted 182 total yards in his career, while Lytle finished his career as Michigan’s All-Time Leading Rusher and is in the College Football Hall of Fame. No upset here. Lytle moves on to Round 2.


(#8) Fritz Seyferth vs. (#9) Chuck Heater

While both of these backs scored about the same amount of TD’s, it’s the yardage that separates these two. Fritz Seyferth scored 14 TD’s and ran for over 500 yards in his M career as a blocking fullback (see Billy Taylor’s TD run vs. OSU in 1971). Chuck Heater is most remembered as a current College Coordinator and Coach with notable stops in Colorado (with Bill McCartney) and Florida (with Urban Meyer). In a mild upset, Heater with almost 2,000 yards and 17 TD’s, gets the nod to move on to Round 2.


(#5) Ed Shuttlesworth vs. (#12) Gil Chapman

In a matchup of great Bob Ufer nicknames, The “Jersey Jet,” Gil Chapman, put up a good fight, but it wasn’t enough to take down “Easy Ed” Shuttlesworth. For those who don’t remember Chapman, think Jamie Morris – just not as powerful. Remembered most for his 58-yard end around scamper for a TD against MSU in 1972, Chapman was a great change of pace back compared to the bruisers and pounders that Bo loved to ram down the opponents’ throats back in the day. The nod goes to Shuttlesworth as he was one tough guy between the tackles. He averaged 777 yards a season and hit paydirt 26 times in his career. With over 2,300 yards rushing, “Easy Ed” advances to the second round.

More »

17. February 2017 · Comments Off on Fake News · Categories: 2017

From the Michigan Daily archives, Saturday January 19, 1901:

The news was a little less fake a couple weeks later, February 1, 1901:

15. February 2017 · Comments Off on What if Michigan Never Returned to the Big Ten? · Categories: 2017

Michigan returns to the Big Ten Conference (1917)

“Fine you guys, we’ll come back. No hard feelings?”

Readers of this site probably know at least the basics of the drama that led Michigan’s departure from the Big Ten between 1906-1908 and its subsequent return in 1917.   As a refresher check out my posts and naturally Papa John U. Bacon has a wonderful discussion of the drama here.

Given the history and deep ties between U-M and the B1G conference since those days astray, it seems hard to comprehend an alternate reality where your beloved Wolverines are not part of the conference.  I really never have put much thought into the notion of U-M going it alone.

Enter SB Nation’s Matt Brown.  He’s working on a book around a series of college football ‘what if’ scenarios.  He reached out to ask me a few beauties, leading off with a hypothetical gem:

Brown:  In your personal opinion, do you think Michigan could have sustained playing as an independent outside of the Big Ten? How do you think that would have impacted Big Ten history?

Me: The most likely outcome is that interest in Michigan football wanes, Yost loses influence and the anti-football academic forces at U-M gain power. If Yost is even still around in the early 1920s, he definitely doesn’t get the support [from the university or from boosters financially] to build Michigan Stadium.  Then you have the stock market crash in 1929 and the Great Depression, and you have to wonder if Michigan football slowly fades away like Chicago.  So Michigan doesn’t win the national titles in the early 1930s or the late 1940s – there’s no Fritz Crisler or winged helmet.  Cats and dogs start living together.

If Michigan does survive outside the B1G, it would have taken a stroke of luck and possibly an iconic Rockne-like coach to build a strong independent following like Notre Dame.  And speaking of the Irish, the bitterness following the 1910 game cancellation would be put aside in the early 1920s and Michigan would have to try schedule regular games with the Irish and hopefully do the same with a few Big Ten teams as well.

Of course we’re talking about football, but think of the impact on all of the other sports.  Travel wasn’t as easy back then, and moving back and forth from the east coast for meets and matches would have been a major drain. Maybe a few rivalries emerge but nothing like the broad set of historic rivalries that Michigan enjoyed in conference.  Michigan athletics would suffer big time.

I’m sure the Big Ten survives and thrives, but removing an original member and a crown jewel (with a national reputation) it just isn’t as strong.

How much of the Big Ten’s decision to push for rules that appeared to disadvantage Michigan the most, in your opinion, was motivated by jealousy, or a specific desire to get at Yost, and how much do you think was a reaction to say, anti-football panic nationally? It’s a bit unclear, to me. Certainly a desire to take a hard stand on reform, while eastern schools dithered, would have been attractive for midwestern leaders. 

Of course Michigan fans still view the rules as a direct shot at Michigan – I think primarily to take Yost down a couple pegs.   The truth is probably more in between a desire to control the sport (including for safety) and its place within academic institutions.  But as chronicled  in John Kryk’s excellent book, Stagg vs. Yost, the Chicago coach was very manipulative and had a lot of power in the conference and in the media, and would do just about anything to cut out Yost’s legs.

Why did the Big Ten change its mind ?

It doesn’t seem like the Big Ten pushed back on Michigan’s return.  Admittedly my perspective and my sources are heavily shaped by a Michigan’s view of the situation, but I don’t find much evidence of resistance  in any form, from the conference when U-M decided it wanted back in.   The various groups (alumni, students, Yost, regents) within Michigan brought the topic to a head early in 1917 and overwhelmingly supported a return.   The conference immediately allowed the Wolverines to complete in a conference track meet that spring.   The other schools welcomed the decision Michigan made to return – not the other way around.  Once it was official on U-M’s side, it seemed football schedules were immediately updated.  Only Northwestern had an open date available in the fall of 1917 so a game was scheduled, and others had to wait for openings.

The fact is the conference was stronger with Michigan in it (competitively and financially) – so it’s not hard to understand why U-M was welcomed back.  And for what it’s worth, the U.S. entered World War I in April 1917 – precisely the time all this was going down – so  you have to wonder if people were more inclined to set aside gridiron-infused grudges.

If the Big Ten banned conference members from playing Michigan during this era, how were they able to schedule games against Minnesota in 1909 and 1910?

Michigan AD Charles Baird found that early on, the new conference rules didn’t absolutely prohibit conference teams from scheduling competition with Michigan–they just required that Michigan comply with the conference rules (specifically around player eligibility).   So Baird agreed to comply with the eligibility rules for these 2 games with Minnesota and the schools signed a contract.  Both games were pretty major events [Ed. and umm, without the 1909 game we probably don’t have a Little Brown Jug rivalry and thus the world is a horrible place], and caused some Gopher faithful to consider the benefits of leaving the conference.  The conference reacted by enacting the “boycott rule–finally officially blocking any conference team from scheduling a foe that previously was a member of the conference (meaning Michigan and anyone else who dared join them).
[Ed. Good luck to Matt on the book.  Here’s another potential topic for Brown: what if Michigan didn’t get screwed by the refs over and over again? :)  When I get more details (title, timing, where to buy) on the book I’ll be sure to let you know.  -G]
27. January 2015 · Comments Off on 1867-1939 Michigan Uniform Timeline · Categories: 2017


Welcome to the MVictors Uniform Timeline where below you will find a descending timeline of changes to the Michigan football team uniforms over the years.

Current Timeline is here (2010-current)  |  2000-2009 – Click here  |  1990-1999 – Click here  | 1980-1989 – Click here  | 1970-1979 – Click here  | 1940-1969 – Click here   |  1867-1939 – Click here

Note:  For all uniform changes prior to 1970, the rules change a bit.  If I have a compelling photo of an actual jersey (or portion of a jersey) over this period, I will include it in the timeline even if it didn’t mark a particular change in design or new feature:

October 1, 1938  | Ann Arbor, MI | vs. Michigan State
HELMET:  Fritz Crisler takes over as head coach, introduces the “winged” helmet design.  Photo of the Michigan State game via the 1939 Michiganensian:
1 Kromer running
1931 Season | Ann Arbor
JERSEY: Remarkably what is believed to be an actual 1931 jersey belonging to former player Norm Daniels showed up on eBay in 2008:

1931 Michigan football jersey


1930 Season | Ann Arbor
JERSEY: This is the first season jersey numbers appear on the front of Michigan uniforms, evidenced by the end-of-year team photos:

 1930 Michigan Football Jersey

1929 Season | Ann Arbor
JERSEY:  Last season without numbers on the front of jerseys:

November 10, 1928 | Baltimore, MD (Baltimore Stadium) | vs. Navy
JERSEY:  Navy insisted on wearing blue, so Michigan team wore “bright yellow jerseys with blue numbers.  The team was said to look like canaries, and the uniforms were put away after the 6-6 tie.” (Source:  Champions of the West)

Here’s a look at the canaries via a shot from the game in the 1929 Michiganensian:
1928 Michigan Canary uniforms

1927 (End of Season) | Ann Arbor, MI
JERSEY:  Following the 1927 season, Michigan retires the #47 jersey belonging to Bennie Oosterbaan.(In 2012 Oosterbaan and the #47 officially entered the Michigan Football Legends program and returned to the field, before being re-retired on November 28, 2015 when the Legends program ended.)   Below, a colorized version of Oosterbaan’s 1927 uniform:



November 12, 1927  | Ann Arbor, MI | vs. Navy
HELMET:  To create contrast with Navy’s uniform, Michigan paints its helmets “a bright maize color” for the game. Here’s a clip from the Michigan Daily prior to the game:


November 22, 1924  | Ann Arbor, MI | vs. Iowa
HELMET:  According to the Michigan Daily, U-M wears “white-washed headgears”.

October 1, 1927 | vs. Ohio Wesleyan | Ann Arbor MI
Michigan Stadium holds its first game, a 33-0 victory over Ohio Wesleyan:

February 1917 | Ann Arbor, MI
Michigan returns to the Big Ten Conference

1915 Season | Ann Arbor, MI
JERSEY:  According to U-M Bentley Historical Library, numbers appear on Michigan uniforms for the first time in 1915, appearing only on the back of the jersey.

1915 Michigan Football

1912(?) Season | Ann Arbor, MI
JERSEY/HELMET/SHOES:  Put up for auction in 2010, what appears to be an authentic full uniform from the (approximately) early 1910s (perhaps 1912 or 1913?) Michigan football team:
1911 Michigan uniform
October 11, 1910 | Michigan Daily
JERSEY: The Daily posts a variety of options on of whether Michigan should put numbers on football jerseys:

1908 Season (this played out between 1906-1908).
Michigan leaves Big Ten Conference over new rules controlling the schedule (5 games), benefits to players (training tables), eligibility (3 years vs. 4), and the big one for Michigan – the head coach had to also be a member of the faculty (Yost was not).

October 31, 1903 | Minneapolis, MN | vs. Minnesota
Following Michigan’s 6-6 tie against Minnesota, U-M leaves a water jug behind.  Minnesota keeps the jug as a souvenir, eventually forming the tradition that is the Little Brown Jug rivalry.

1901 Season | All Games
Fielding Yost’s first season in Ann Arbor.  The team finishes 11-0, outscores opponents 550-0 including a 49-0 victory over Stanford in the Rose Bowl, the first college “bowl” game.

An interesting find from author John Kryk at the U-M Bentley Historical Library – a colorized version of the 1901 team photo.  (It’s unclear when this was done and whether the color tones are accurate, but worthy of posting here nonetheless).



November 24, 1898  | Chicago, IL | vs. Chicago
Michigan defeats Amos Alonzo Stagg’s Chicago Maroons 12-11.  Following the game student Louis Elbel pens ‘The Victors’:

February 8, 1896 | Chicago, IL 
CONFERENCE:  The Big Ten is formed with original members Michigan, Northwestern, Iowa, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Purdue and Chicago.

November 23, 1887 | South Bend, IN | vs. Notre Dame
On a trip to Chicago, Michigan visits Notre Dame and teaches a group of men the game of football.  From John Kryk’s Natural Enemies:

At about 11 o’clock the elevens trotted onto the slop, which we can only assume was somehow marked to proper proportions. Before the players were set to have at it, Brother Paul informed DeHaven that the Notre Dame boys – several of them former classmates of DeHaven’s and Harless’s – had had trouble playing by the book. Brother Paul then suggested the teams at first be mixed for a brief period of hands-on instruction. The Wolverines agreed.

“So we played gently with them that day,” DeHaven recalled, “…and carefully taught Notre Dame how to play modern football.”

When the Notre Dame players learned just how physical this brand was, they took to it with reckless abandon. Too reckless, actually. One student in attendance recalled DeHaven and company having to caution their eager pupils against playing too violently.

After this brief tutorial, the players segregated into their proper squads and played a 30-minute game. When both sides finished slipping, rolling, and tumbling in the mud, Michigan tallied two touchdowns (worth four points each) to win 8-0. It was said the Notre Dame players, as well as the students in attendance, appreciated the fact the Wolverines did not try to run it up on their disadvantaged hosts.

JERSEY:  From the team photo, the majority of the squad wears white jerseys with laces that run all the way up the front.  Lightly colored lettering ‘U of M’ letters are sewn on the front:1887



1885 Season
ALMA MATER: Responding to a contest in the Michigan yearbook, Charles Mills Gayley pens what becomes U-M’s alma mater, “The Yellow and Blue”.

JERSEY:  From the team photo, it appears most of the the team donned dark sweaters with ‘U of M’ brushed or painted onto the front.  Several of the players all wear a short beanie cap:
1885 UofM script


May 30, 1879 | Chicago, IL (White Stocking Park) | vs. Racine
JERSEY & SHOE/SOCKS: According to Champions of the West, the uniform’s for the first game in history consisted of “white, close-fitting canvas with blue stockings and a belt.”   Based on the team photo available at the U-M Bentley Library, the team also donned nifty striped hats:

1879 Team Photo

February 12, 1867 | Ann Arbor, MI
MISC: Michigan officially adopts maize and blue as its school colors (more here):

Our college colors were chosen at a meeting of the literary department held in the chapel on Saturday, February 12, 1867, when Milton Jackson, ’67, Albert H. Pattengill, ’68, and J. Eugene Jackson, ’69, the committee appointed for the purpose, reported a resolution in favor of “azure-blue and maize”, which was adopted. In about ten years the colors came to be styled, as they are now styled, yellow and blue. The original blue was neither light nor very dark, and the yellow was decidedly golden. Never has there been any warrant for the sickly yellow and the faded blue furnished by some of the tradesmen of Detroit and Ann Arbor.