Home > Archive 2009 > Michigan vs. The Field

Michigan vs. The Field

Pete Tiernan of bracketscience.com plugged all the key stats of the 65 teams into a spreadsheet, performed his analysis and published the rankings in his multimedia blog ($).  I extracted a few of the Wolverine-relevant categories, again, these are versus the entire NCAA field:

Field goal percentage differential versus opponents:
Best: Gonzaga (+.120)
Worst: Michigan (-.011)

Percentage of three-point field goals attempted:
Highest: Michigan (.476)
Lowest: Washington (.205)

Rebounding margin*:
Largest: Michigan State (9.9 rpg)
Smallest: Michigan (-3.1 rpg)

I’m not shocked by any of these stats, but if you handed me just the field goal percentage stat and the rebounding margin before this season, I’d of guessed Michigan would win about 10 games in 2008.  I mean, we shot worse than our opponents and on top of that, we probably didn’t get off as many shots because we didn’t get any rebounds (although I think we do better on the offensive glass because we get some long rebounds).

Granted, this is a comparison against the best teams in the country, but still.  Of course when you see the stat on the three point field goals attempted, we make up for our relatively poor shooting because shot for shot, our attempts on average are worth more if they find the net.

*If you’re wondering, when Michigan and Michigan State played on February 10, we actually outrebounded the Spartans on the offensive glass (9-8), but were edged out in the totals 31-28.

Vegas Says…
For some folks, the only stat that matters comes out of Vegas.  Depending on your book of choice, Michigan’s coming off as a 5 to 5.5 point underdog for Thursday evening’s tilt against Clemson.

Make your March madness grow to pure hysteria when you bet online.

  • Share/Bookmark

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
Tags:

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Chris
    March 17th, 2009 at 16:06 | #1

    I hope Michigan can get a big man for next year. In the UCONN game, Michigan shot well enough to win, there was just absolutely no inside presence to clean up the boards. Go Blue!

    • March 19th, 2009 at 08:24 | #2

      Cronin can fill space; he’ll be there. They should be better as long as Harris and Peedi stay. I don’t think Peedi is close to being ready to jump, and Harris could refine his skills and add some muscle.

  2. Bob
    March 19th, 2009 at 17:21 | #3

    Actually, since we have a very low turnover percentage – and because we force a lot of turnovers – we probably end up taking about as many shots as other teams.

    • March 19th, 2009 at 18:08 | #4

      Bob, my point was looking at those statistics alone, you’d draw certain conclusions. ed 3/20 – BTW, Michigan’s in the bottom third of the tournament in turn-over margin as well.

  1. No trackbacks yet.